Davante adams takes a swipe at the bears at chicago with a blunt refusal to ever play for the Bears, reminding fans why his dominance—and that storied NFC North clash—still resonates today.
When Davante Adams spoke up about the Chicago Bears, it wasn’t just another soundbite — it was a statement that reopened a storied rivalry. The Packers-Bears rivalry is one of the longest-running and most intense in NFL history, and Adams, who spent his prime years with Green Bay, knows full well how much those games mean. With his remarks, he reminded everyone that the fire is still burning.
A Bite of Context: Davante adams takes a swipe at the bears
In his time with the Packers (2014-2021), Adams became one of their most productive wide receivers — and frequently made life miserable for the Bears. According to one report, Adams and his teammates viewed games against Chicago almost as “checklist” wins: they didn’t worry about whether they’d win; they envisioned how much they’d dominate.
His personal numbers against the Bears were impressive: over 1,000 yards and 10 touchdowns in those matchups.
In the broader picture, the Packers-Bears rivalry is the most-played in NFL history, spanning over 200 meetings.
So when Adams said, without hesitation, “I will not be going to Chicago” in a recent interview, it wasn’t just a refusal — it was a reminder of his legacy and the legacy of that rivalry.
The Comment That Sparked It
During an appearance on the “Up & Adams” show with host Kay Adams, Davante was asked whether he would ever play for the Bears. His reply was immediate and firm: “No.”
He elaborated, saying:
“Look, I’m not playing too much longer as it is … I will not be going to Chicago.”
He also added a touch of inside-packer attitude:
“As a Packer, you hate the Bears… you just don’t respect them to the level of, you know, they’re a top-tier team that can compete with us.”
Those words cut deep — especially for Bears fans. While some may see it as playful trash talk, the underlying message is clear: Adams still carries the competitive edge, and he hasn’t softened his stance despite no longer wearing green and gold.
Why This Matters (More Than It Seems)
- Legacy and Identity: For Adams, his time with the Packers was defining. His identity as a Packer-dominator in the division still shapes how he views that rivalry. To him, playing for the Bears would symbolize letting go of an important legacy.
- Rivalry Reignition: Rivalries rely on narratives — heroes, villains, wins, losses, emotion. Adams adding fuel back into that fire keeps the rivalry alive.
- Motivation & Mindset: His remark that games versus Chicago were occasions to “go crazy and set records” hints at a mindset of dominance rather than competition.
- Public Performance: Even after leaving the Packers, Adams’ comments remind fans, media and the Bears organization that he’s still emotionally invested.
- Fan Reaction: Bears fans are visceral in their responses. A comment like this isn’t just words — it reignites old pain points of losses, frustrations, broken expectations.
The Fallout: Reaction, Ripples & Stakes
The immediate reaction from Chicago media and fans was sharp. Headlines read like “Adams will never play for the Bears” and “Adams still hasn’t forgotten.” Some Bears fans took offense, some laughed it off — but most understood that Adams’ swipe fits into a larger, long-standing drama.
For the Packers side, it reinforces the dominant era they had in the NFC North when Adams was contributing big week after week. For Bears, it’s another reminder of how many seasons felt like a struggle in that division.
From a broader NFL perspective, it showcases how individual player remarks can impact team narratives, fan emotions, media cycles — and even future matchups.
The Numbers: Why Adams Has the Right to Talk
- Adams posted 81 catches for 1,024 yards and 10 touchdowns in games against the Bears.
- The Packers hold a 108–96–6 edge in the series (as of early 2025).
- From 2019-2024, the Packers won 11 straight games in the series.
Given those figures, Adams’ perspective isn’t just trash talk — it reflects a history of dominance.
Tactical Note: Why Games Against the Bears Always Mattered
- The NFC North division games carry high stakes.
- For Green Bay, beating Chicago often meant securing tiebreakers, momentum, and playoff positioning.
- For Chicago, winning at least one game a year against the Packers was a key measure of progress.
- Players like Adams understood that these games are psychologically heavy — beating your rival isn’t just a win; it’s a message.
When Adams says he viewed those games as opportunities to set records rather than worry about winning, it shows how confident the Packers were and how the Bears often lacked that edge.
What This Means for Future Match-ups
Even though Adams no longer plays in the NFC North, rivalries have long memories. His comments keep the emotional strands alive:
- If the Packers and Bears meet again (and they will), the narrative will include “remember what Adams said.”
- Young Bears players may carry that burn forward — wanting to silence former foes.
- Packers fans may use it as motivation: “Our guy still insists he won’t play for the Bears — let’s keep winning.”
In many ways, Adams’ comment acts as a bridge between eras — connecting the dominance of the past with the challenges of the present.
Beyond the Words: The Man Behind Them
Davante Adams isn’t just good with words — he’s been one of the most dependable receivers in his generation. His ability to win contested catches, make acrobatic plays, and deliver in high-stakes games earned him multiple Pro Bowls and All-Pro selections.
Still, his competitiveness, especially in divisional games, is what separates him. The unwavering attitude he displayed against the Bears defines part of his brand.
While some will call his comments harsh or disrespectful, others will say it’s simply honesty. For Adams, the rivalry never died — and his voice reminds us of that fact.
The Bears’ Side of the Story
From the Bears’ perspective, the remarks sting because they reflect frustration and pain. The Packers’ dominance, the losses, the feeling of never quite reaching their rival’s level — Adams’ words validate that frustration.
And yes, the Bears are in a different spot now than in their historic eras. Their rebuilds, coaching changes, and seasons of underperformance amplify the weight of comments like “you’re not top tier.”
But rivalries aren’t just about current records; they’re about memory, history, identity. Adams’ swipe taps into that.
The Why: Why He Did It
- Legacy preservation: Adams wants to protect how his career will be remembered — and part of that is dominance over the Bears.
- Competitive fire: He still identifies as that player who never backed down.
- Narrative control: By addressing the topic himself, he frames the story rather than leaving interpretation to others.
- Motivation: Perhaps part of it is for him — to stay mentally sharp, engaged, and focused on rivalry rather than complacency.
Critical Reflection: Is This Smart?
One could argue whether publicly dismissing a rival is smart. Potential risks:
- Gives the Bears extra motivation.
- Creates narrative distractions for Adams and his team (now in the AFC).
- Could be seen as disrespectful and reflect poorly.
On the flip side:
- He knows the league, the fans, and the rivalry.
- The Packers-Bears games will always matter; this keeps interest alive.
- It supports his brand of competitiveness.
Final Thoughts
Davante adams takes a swipe at the bears, In the landscape of NFL rivalries, comments like these keep stories alive. Davante Adams may have moved on from Green Bay — but he clearly hasn’t moved past the Bears. The intensity, the pride, the history all matter. His blunt refusal to “play for the Bears” is more than soundbite — it’s a reminder that rivalries don’t fade just because time moves on.
In the end, whether you admire him or root against him, Adams’ words add fuel to one of football’s richest rivalries. Whether you’re in Green Bay, Chicago or somewhere else entirely, the ripple effects will be felt. And that’s part of what makes the Packers-Bears saga enduring: the past, the present and the promise of next time all collide.
